Network with Captive Review on LinkedIn

Follow Captive Review on Twitter

RSS

18th of May 2012

New Zealand IPSA loses captives and ‘credibility’

Vicky Beckett 07/12/2011

Five Australian captives have been asked to leave New Zealand as under new legislation they do not have sufficient policy holders for a licence.
 
Under New Zealand’s new Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act foreign insurance companies can be refused a licence unless they have a significant New Zealand asset base.
 
To date two potential captives have ruled out New Zealand as an acceptable domicile Peter Lowe, Willis general manager, New Zealand, has reported.
 
Steven Chirico AM Best assistant vice-president, said: “Some of the smaller, niche insurers could fall short of new standards under the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act (IPSA) as minimum capital requirements (MCR) are deemed to be too onerous.”
 
However, Lowe explained the $1m MCR and solvency calculation ‘is no more stringent than other captive domiciles, in particular Bermuda, Guernsey, Cayman Islands and Vermont.’
 
“However, Singapore has a significant advantage over New Zealand and other international captive domiciles with its approach to MCR and solvency margins,” Lowe added.
 
“Captives owned by New Zealand companies have evaluated local domiciles within easy reach and time zone of New Zealand, namely Vanuatu, Cook Islands and Singapore.”
 
However, a spokesperson from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand argues that section 4 of IPSA includes the need to avoid unnecessary compliance costs and to maintain competition in the insurance sector.
 
“IPSA also contains provisions which recognise that some requirements are not appropriate for all types of insurers and that captives do not insure members of the public,” she said.
 
“The minimum capital requirement of $NZ3m for non-life insurers has been reduced to $NZ1m for captive insurers and the requirement to have an insurer financial strength rating does not apply to these entities.”
 
Lowe said the IPSA regulations have ‘led to a loss of employment, taxation dollars and credibility for the New Zealand Insurance legislation.’
 
IPSA is now in force with a graduated approach until September 2013.
 
All insurance companies and captives must have provisional licences issued by 31 March 2012 and a final licence will be issued to them by September 2013.

Tags: Captives, IPSA, Minimum capital requirement, New Zealand, Regulation, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Solvency, Willis

Post a comment

Post a comment

Be the first to comment on this article!

Captive Insurance Database (CID)is the world's most comprehensive online source of captive market intelligence.

CID gives users instant access to the names of parent companies who currently own a captive. It also provides the names and contact details of captives’ risk managers, as well as the parent or ultimate parent companies’ address, country, CFO, CEO, and exchange.

CID also gives you the captive name, manager, licence and incorporation date and the type of captive the parent company is running.

CID will help you to:

•    Win more business proactively – Search from 5,700 captives and over 3,700 captive owners who you can offer your services to.


•    Increase profit and efficiency – Target specific captive owners and sponsors quicker, saving you time.


•    Build relationships
Access detailed contact information for each decision-maker. 

An annual CID licence costs just £1,195 + VAT.

Already a CID user?Login here.

Order a 2 year subscription and SAVE 25%
The licence includes full online access to CID and a free annual hardcopy of CID (worth £610).To find out more contact Nick Byrne on +44 (0) 20 7029 4027 or
cid@captivereview.com.

more//

Company and Ratings Search

Search A.M. Best's extensive database of life/health, property/casualty and insurance companies worldwide.

more//

Cell Company Guide

WELCOME TO THE Captive Review Cell Company Handbook 2009 – the second edition of our global directory of cell company jurisdictions. Since we last published this directory, the general attitude toward cell companies seems to have shifted up a gear. Whereas single-parent companies have long ruled the captive roost, a slight uptick in the formation of pure captives at the beginning of this year can’t hide the fact that growth in this market is still sluggish.

more//

Pellentesque feugiat arcu vitae lacus elementum in ullamcorper diam pulvinar. In odio massa, facilisis sed dignissim vel, vehicula ac diam. Curabitur tempor, quam nec aliquam tempus, dui lorem venenatis arcu

Mauris accumsan orci ut turpis placerat condimentum. Ut sit amet lobortis purus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.

CID